Other surprises include the above average speakers and excellent CPU performance with sustainable Turbo Boost because of the large temperature overhead. The 1x1 card offers a maximum transfer rate of just 433 Mbps compared to 867 Mbps or 1.73 Gbps on most Ultrabooks and pricier gaming notebooks. We would have preferred a more capable 150 W AC adapter for the additional power overhead. Idling on desktop will draw anywhere from 7 W to 11 W depending on the Power profile and screen brightness setting. Thus, we refer to our two existing reviews for more information. See our table of SSDs and HDDs for more benchmark comparisons. (±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.08 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. Much like how the i5-7300HQ was the CPU of choice for affordable gaming laptops of yesteryear, expect to see the i5-8300H on more entry-level laptops moving forward. It wasn't until after we applied Windows updates and stopped background activity from MSI Dragon Center and Norton Anti-Virus that sequential write rates would bounce back up to a more normal 489 MB/s. Outdoor visibility is average at best when under shade and poor when under direct sunlight or on an overcast day. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. Product specification, functions and appearance may vary by models and differ from country to country. NVIDIA, the NVIDIA logo, GeForce, GeForce RTX, and NVIDIA Turing are registered trademarks and/or trademarks of NVIDIA Corporation in the United States and other countries. The small hinges are adequate and uniform up to their maximum of 150 degrees. 8:01. This makes the GL63 one of the least noisiest 15.6-inch gaming laptops available with Nvidia GTX graphics. We stress the notebook to identify for any potential throttling or stability issues. Our test unit today is the affordable GL63 that directly succeeds last year's GL62M and GL62. Buy MSI GL Series Core i5 8th Gen - (8 GB/1 TB HDD/Windows 10 Home/4 GB Graphics/NVIDIA Geforce GTX 1050) GL63 8RC Gaming Laptop Online For Rs.74990 , Also get MSI GL Series Core i5 8th Gen - (8 GB/1 TB HDD/Windows 10 Home/4 GB Graphics/NVIDIA Geforce GTX 1050) GL63 8RC Gaming Laptop Specifications & Features. The names and logos of third party products and companies shown on our website and used in the materials are the property of their respective owners and may also be trademarks. Only Genuine Products. 30 Day Replacement Guarantee. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. The benchmark was performed before updating Windows and our attempts to rerun the benchmark after updating would always fail even when using the latest version of the benchmark tool (1.0.1238 64). Strangely, the CPU can be observed periodically dropping to 800 MHz for very short periods, but this thankfully does not occur when gaming. Jetzt bei Amazon.de bestellen! MSI, MSI gaming, dragon, and dragon shield names and logos, as well as any other MSI service or product names or logos displayed on the MSI website, are registered trademarks or trademarks of MSI. Performance is about 10 percent and 20 faster than the common i7-7700HQ and i7-6700HQ, respectively, found on most last generation gaming laptops. We recommend ejecting the card before transporting to avoid bending or cracking. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. In particular, we recommend double-checking the WLAN and mouse keys and updating Windows immediately after purchase since we experienced issues on our test unit. Running on battery power will severely limit CPU and GPU performance. While we didn't experience issues when connected to an 802.11ac network, our system would constantly disconnect from an 802.11n network. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 50%Compared to all devices tested» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%.